This mapping is possible because low-resolution and high-resolution images have similar image content and differ primarily in high-frequency details. The VDSR network learns the mapping between low- and high-resolution images. This automated thing certainly could speed up some shit, and it looks sweet for those who don't already have methods, but for me it looks sort of "meh" so far.ĮDIT: Here is a comparison, from a meme that I thought was disgustingly pixelated.VDSR is a convolutional neural network architecture designed to perform single image super-resolution. All of the results I see can be achieved with filters, IMO. Honestly, looking at all these examples so far, I can't for the life of me figure out what the neural networking stuff adds to this process. I hardly ever use PS, but I think Fractalius is likely to have a similar function. There are lots of ways to scale up an image and lose minimal details, as well as lots of methods of sharpening that help to reduce graininess and pixelation. In addition to Rodilius, I also use "Warp Sharp" (in GIMP this is under "Script-fu -> Sharpness") for different types of edge preservation/restoration, and several other smoothers that offer more fine control, like "G'MIC -> Testing -> Iain Fergusson -> Multi Scale Smoothing". That's most of the work, though fine-tuning is key because not all images are going to respond the same way, depending on content, light, details, and degree of enlargement. Then in a second step increase the sharpness to ~250-275, then increase "Smoothness" to "1". First I'll increase the sharpness to maybe ~225. Then I open up G'MIC and "Artistic -> Rodilius" and slide all the sliders left. I first scale the image up with "Image -> Scale Image -> Sinc (Lanczos3). Waste even more time: /r/InternetIsUseless /r/AndroidIsBeautiful Was your post removed from here? Found a cool site that's not particularly unique or beautiful? Head on over to /r/InternetIsInteresting. If this subreddit for whatever reason fails to provide the interactivity you need, we also highly recommend a look at /r/interactivewebsites for a less diluted dosage of interactivity. If you exhibit a similar addictive lust for information as you do for internet, we highly recommend you go give /r/dataisbeautiful a sub too. Something different? Try /r/InternetIsUgly. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but we have beheld a lot! This subreddit is highly curated and the moderators frequently must use their discretion and judgement as a team when enforcing our rules.Personal attacks, bigotry, fighting words and otherwise shitty behavior will be removed and may result in a ban. We enforce a standard of common decency and civility here.Includes Facebook, Google+, or otherwise.Įxtensions, software, or other content which requires a download to use. Websites that require a login or email address. Sites that pose a potential security risk. Online stores, paid services, or sites which serve only to sell a specific product. Sites that serve a political agenda or otherwise induce drama Static images, gifs, animations that serve the same purpose of gifs or collections of either. Something not unique (includes generators, blogs, tumblrs, etc.) Something everyone on the internet already knows about (e.g., Netflix, Khan Academy, etc.) What NOT to post (detailed explanations can be found here): Minimal or beautifully designed websites.Īwesome websites that offer a unique service.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |